An Argument Supporting the Implementation of Capital Punishment Essay An Argument Supporting the Implementation of Capital Punishment Introduction Capital punishment, or the death penalty, is the execution of a convicted criminal by the state as punishment for crimes known as capital crimes or capital offences. Historically, the execution of criminals and political opponents was used by nearly all societies — both to punish crime and to suppress political dissent. Among democratic countries around the world, most European all of the European UnionLatin American, and many Pacific Area states including Australia, New Zealand and Timor Leste have abolished capital punishment, while the United States, Guatemala, and most of the Caribbean as well as some democracies in Asia and Africa retain it.
Death by Beheading 7. Electrocution All these types are of inhumane nature. The questions that arise here - when there are other means of punishment available today, why we still persist with such inhumane punishments?
Human life has a fundamental value. The blessedness of human life is denied by the death penalty. Possibilities of Error When an individual stands for a trial, he is convicted on the basis of the evidence against him. There have been times wherein evidence has been fabricated against an individual to settle personal scores.
If later investigations find that there has been an error in judgment, then it can release the person and compensate him for the injustice, however, in case of a death penalty, the jury can do nothing apart from feeling guilty for taking the life of an innocent.
Unfair Judgment Generally, it is observed that capital punishment is inflicted unduly on the poor and minorities. If you follow the data of these victims, you will find that the mentally ill, poor, and people belonging to minorities form a large chunk of the total number.
You can also notice a kind of racial discrimination happens due to varied reasons. Because the poor can offer very low compensation the defense lawyers are often incompetent, resulting in losing the case.
Due to prejudice and bias, poor people, and people from minority sections become soft target for such capital punishments, as unrestricted discretion has been offered to District attorney.
If any one wants to appeal, then it becomes a burdensome process for him often resulting in denial of justice. Lack of Deterrence The purpose of any punishment should be deterrence from repeating the same act.
But, according to the statistics available, the death penalty has not been effective in controlling the homicide rate. The studies have revealed the shocking truth that executions actually increase the murder rate.
That means the capital punishment does not deter violent crime. Prolonged Uncertainty The validity to the deterrence argument is annulled by the delays, endless appeals, retrials, and technicalities that keeps a person waiting for execution for years.
In fact, we are not competent enough to carry out execution. This uncertainty and incompetence offers another great injustice. It is itself cruel and a form of torture.
Justifying Circumstances Sometimes, individuals suffering from emotional trauma, abandonment, violence, neglect or destructive social environment commit such heinous crimes.
These mitigating situations can have devastating effect on their humanity. So, it is unfair to hold them fully responsible for their crimes.
It is our social responsibility to show sympathy to some extent. Effects on Society Capital Punishment is itself a premeditated murder. This is unacceptable even it is inflicted by state authority as it lowers the value of life. In fact, such act can only brutalize the society. By witnessing such acts, our own mental makeup starts believing that violence is necessary to curb the wrongdoings.
In conclusion, capital punishment is a moral dishonor.
The mockery is that the very civilizations that have no right to impose it, are in particular leading the traditions of capital punishments. The economic malfunctions and cultural diseases in those very societies contribute to the violence.
So, instead of inflicting capital punishment, it's our duty to provide opportunities for all people to accomplish a good life in a rational culture.Death Penalty: Essay Against the Use of Capital Punishment Death Penalty: Essay Against the Use of Capital Punishment The death penalty is the ultimate cruel, inhuman and degrading punishment.
It denies criminals their natural born right to life. The first established death penalty laws dat. Jul 08, · Essay on Capital Punishment. Taking a Look at Capital Punishment. A Non-Pacifist Argument Against Capital Punishment; Corporal Punishment; Capital Punishment; The Morality of Capital Punishment; Capital Punishment in America; Death Penalty as an Effective Method of Punishment;.
Capital Punishment: The arguments for and against. The most common and most cogent argument against capital punishment is that sooner or later, innocent people will get killed, because of mistakes or flaws in the justice system.
– is violated by the current implementation of capital punishment in the USA. Jul 31, · The most common and most cogent argument against capital punishment is that sooner or later, innocent people will get killed, because of mistakes or flaws in the justice system. But discrimination in the criminal justice system is not truly an argument against capital punishment.
At its best, it is an argument for its careful implementation. In fact, most of the social and philosophical arguments against capital punishment are really not arguments against it at all. A Strong Argument Against Capital Punishment. By 4–3, the court held that “capital punishment has become incompatible with contemporary standards of decency in Connecticut and, therefore.